Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! Asahi Optical's Pentax KX was one of the first cameras with this lens mount, acting as a midrange model in the lineup. you can see here a lot of photos mostly shot with the f/4 version. A coupe of stage shows, one very recent, and a random collection using this lens exclusively Wonderful image quality, lots of detail, contrasty, subject separation, fast and accurate AF, bright viewfinder, solid construction, unobtrusive in use, No weather sealing, makes all my other lenses look poor (even the 'L' zooms that, when I first got them, imagined could hardly be improved on). I own a 135 since the film days (because you "had to have one" and could not afford much else), still have the zeiss Jena f3.5 M42 and even jumped for the zeiss f2.8 for my yashica when they were sold for next to nothing. Andysea, those are great images on your website. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC lens is a fantastic companion for the Canon 60Da, as it offers a useful "mid-range" focal length for a variety of deep-sky projects. But again i am just at the beginning and i also do not want to use now a telescope. There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. Find out what happens when Chris shoots some very expired APS film using old Canon and Nikon cameras. It could really use an update to its coatings. Used on a crop body the results are still splendid but you gain on DOF, making it a great combination for wedding/event and ambient/available light. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC. If 135mm f2 works for you, then fine. There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. What I see is a photographer who should maybe instead stick to the kit lens, and learn composition first. Explore the sky, try frame some targets and see what works well with your DSLR and lens combination. Has a good weight to it. With this lens you don't need to do much if any post processing. A lot of us have been saying this for years. I also find the other photos not very good. Simple fact is the Samyang 135/2 is a remarkably good lens for the price, and it offers a set of optical characteristics that typically cost 2-4x more. 45 minutes. In my test, nikon have the same color correction than Canon and same sharpness. Definetely the most sharpest lens which I have ever seen. When i check a F stop chart, i see 15 stops if i count the main, and the secondary ones: 2, 2.4, 2.8, 3.3, 4, 4.8, 5.6, 6.7, 8, 9.5, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22. CP+ 2023: Sigma has announced it is bringing its trio of DC DN APS-C prime lenses to Nikon's Z mount: its first lenses for Nikon's mirrorless system. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. Samyang 135 f/2 astrophotography gallery Below some pictures I made using Samyang 135 lens with QHY163 mono camera and iOptron Smart EQ Pro mount. This is the EF-M series version. In fact, in my test shots, I noticed that the red channel was a little softer than green and blue. The inset picture is a magnified view of the bottom right corner of the frame. I do not see much difference in background blur or bokeh. Stage photography is another good use for the 135 L. Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. Thanks Gary! 30-35% diameter reduction is usually necessary on "good" lenses. The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. Please send your photos of the Andromeda galaxy. The first telephoto lens of choice, especially recommended for beginners, is the 135mm F2.5 SMC Pentax. I got many great shots from this lens but also missed ton of shots due manual focus only. The only thing that could possibly make this better would be to add IS. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. I just wish this lens had IS for low light and portraits with flash. best lens, blur, sharp-super, no CA, minimal shading. Just plain black plastic (no interior felt as in newer lens hoods). The following image was captured by Eric Cauble using the Samyang branded version of this lens. A quick question, I have a Sony a6300 mirrorless camera which is great but the sensor is very close behind the mount. Everyone should have one? Thanks, Chris, hi Trevor my name is sagar i have same lens but i have one question why lot of stars are appearing in my image which is taken thru rokinon 135mm, Your email address will not be published. The lenses I selected are all affordable prime lenses, easily available on the second-hand market, and adaptable to the EOS system. I owned this lens for a long time, then traded it for the 70-200 2.8IS II. Digital sensors are roughly 5 times as sharp as 400-speed film. For comparison, no other lens I know of would earn more than 8/10. You can go lower, but you have to watch your technique. They create a beautiful, mesmerizing dreamscape in their photos, and their secret weapon, besides an impeccable sense for aesthetics, is the 135mm F2 lens. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. Agreed. Yes, each can produce different results (And that's why I keep and use several different lenses), but my point is that sharpness or bokeh are not the only factors for portraits -- sometimes it just comes down to convenience or price! The lens hood is removable (and reversible), which makes packing the Rokinon 135mm away into the included lens pouch possible. The duck and cat are really the only good shots. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 Instead it means the style of rendering. Micael Widell is a photography enthusiast based in Stockholm, Sweden. The downsides of this configuration are that shooting wide open can make focusing difficult. Aside from being much more affordable, telephoto lenses are easier to transport, easier to mount and easier to guide, and are much more likely to produce encouraging results to a beginner. But will live with it as it provides good protection of the front element. The extent of this influence lies mainly in photographer's perception and creativity.As all arts photography may serve given needs due to numerous reasons with the resulting integrity of the work not necessarily suggesting art.The photographic gear (from lens cleaning tissues up to s/w) is just the tool(s) of a photographer in order to produce its work. Canon 135mm f/2 L Review - Ken Rockwell +1 for the 135mm lens. (purchased for $1,625), reviewed January 27th, 2010 With an effective focal length of roughly 216mm when coupled with a Canon crop sensor body, the field of view is nearly identical to the one youd find on a full-frame camera with a 200mm telephoto lens. The 135mm Rokinon with the Canon Rebel seems like a pretty good setup. These were just a tad less sharp at the corners than their Canon competition, but certainly extremely sharp all over the field if closed down one stop or even half a stop. My work requires auto-focus. Do I wish it were manufactured with metal? Yet the Jaegers becomes essentially color free when stopped down to 3in. Photography is full of fuzzy concepts. The best 200mm lens is precisely the older 200mm F4 SMC Takumar, which comes with the M42 camera thread, and requires the M42-EOS adapter. Writer Anno Huidekoper takes a look at what this manual SLR can do and how it stacks up to its contemporaries. I do not think telephoto lenses would be suitable for use with your modified camera. Your images have a chance at remaining sharper once critical focus has been achieved, but now you have lost the extra light-gathering power you wanted. Canon 300/4 ED IF AF (non-IS) The first shot I ever took with this lens was of my neighbor's cat, as it was sneaking around in a bush. The 200f2.8 L is excellent - I am using it right now. $399 00. Otherwise this lens is absolutely incredible. Reg. The colder temperatures will make DSLR astrophotography much more practical, and there are plenty of great targets to choose from. (purchased for $700), reviewed October 9th, 2012 Manual focus on wide angle lens, for landscapes, ok, if you have a reliable manual focus system, which Samyang, at least in my mount, does not have. The Canon is about as sharp as the Samyang, but it has some very slight chromatic aberration. Using the lens's diaphragm interferes with the light path and results in diffraction spikes which I find unattractive. Canon's 700-200 zooms have IS and are weather sealed two features that the 135 f/2 lacks. What is it like shooting with one today? So I feel I'm being cheated. "If you are a Nikon user, of course have a look at the Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC and compare it to the other lenses mentioned in this article. As it is it is earns a 9. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. Digital Cameras & Digital Camera Kits | Camera Gear | B&H So, let's see where it falls short of perfection: It is good to know that the 200/4 SMC Takumar is good. Rokinon 135mm F/2 Lens for ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY. I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. Flip on through what we found, and see how the lens performs in the real world in our sample gallery. Stuff I used to take the photos. The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion (ED) lens element to control chromatic aberration, and ultra multi-coatings (UMC) to both improve light transmission and reduce flare. (purchased for $890), reviewed July 17th, 2006 F2 allows higher shutter speeds in lower light without raising the ISO. If I got this lens, would it make more sense long term to get the Canon mount with a E mount adaptor so I could fit it more easily to a dedicated astro camera later? I had a 70-200 f/4 that i used unstopped at 200 with awesome results. The flat lens hood design allows you to easily take flat frames with the Rokinon 135mm using the white t-shirt method or using a flat panel. As I posted on the Petapixel variant of this article, cropping a 85/1.4 shot to a 135mm-equivalent FoV gives you approx. Hey Trevor, great article! At least not in my camera (Sony A6000), the focal length in a crop sensor does not make it very suitable for portrait, the photo detail is something else, but without AF that type of photography with that focal distance and at least 80 cm of the subject it requires too much dedication, with how comfortable the DMF approach mode is for that type of photography Also in my mount it does not have any communication with the camera (it does not have a chip, it only has it for Nikon). The CA is pretty low wide open and it rivals my 200mm L lens. if you compare images taken with this lens to those from a 105mm f1.8 ais or a cosina 125mm and you'll see what i mean. The lens is so crisp that the diaphragm blade pattern is visible on point light sources shot at large aperature. In this post, Ill share my results using an affordable prime telephoto lens for astrophotography, the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC. You can barely tell it's a pond.#3: Duck.Birds with bokeh are fine. Samyang 135 f/2 ED astrophotography modifications - astrojolo I have never had a bad experience buying used Canon lenses from eBay sellers with 99.5%+ positive feedback. I use the word design, because although the available 135mm F2 lenses aren't the exact same optical formula, they share many important traits. I have no experience with that lens, Jerry Lodriguss however published a review of that lens on his websitehttp://www.astropix.NIKON_180MM.HTM. Jordan has a simple fix camera manufacturers could implement to improve their video autofocus. Because of some residual chromatic aberration even with the aperture stop, the best focus lies not where the star image is the smallest, but rather just slightly away from infinity, at the point where the star image barely begins to enlarge. The Rokinon 14mm F/2.8 was the first lens I had ever used like this, and these aspects do not hinder the astrophotography experience whatsoever. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. The 135mm f2.8 in particular can take amazing photos of the brighter deep sky objects with about 1 second time . The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC is one of the most affordable and practical lenses for astrophotography on the market. Perfect lens on the same level as CZ! Along with improvements in telescope mounts, camera technology, filters, and digital image processing, these have allowed amateurs to produce astrophotographs of nearly professional quality. Not too heavy. Add To Cart. Valerio, Electronically Assisted Astronomy (No Post-Processing), Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Buckeyestargazer 2022 in review and New Products. That's why I really enjoy shooting portraits with it. Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens Review - The-Digital-Picture.com The extremes are 2 and 22. Focus are dead on with my Fullframe or APS system. However, these APOs have a couple of drawbacks. It may be superfluous to add, but it can't do any harm, that in astrophotography all shutter control must be done with a wired or wireless electrical shutter release swith. Of course headline central sharpness is great, that is what grabs headlines, always shot at f2: any 135mm lens is going to give similar results. Moreover if we have a serendipitous moment regarding a new (or used) lens, that's a good thing. I shoot it wide open 90% of the time. Does the bright star reflection bother you? [emailprotected]. Tack sharp even at wide open aperture. If you want the best possible image quality, and you must have autofocus, and you don't care if it is a bit heavy (maybe you need it for studio use), buy the Sigma. When you buy a lens with fantastic sharpness and image quality at all apertures, you typically expect it to cost $1,200 on up. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. In this new review, I focus exclusively on the unprecedented Samyang 135mm f/2, which is primarily designed for portrait and wildlife. Back in 1999, Sony released the F505, their first digital camera with a Carl Zeiss lens. (purchased for $725), reviewed March 26th, 2013 My 24-70L needs to be stopped down to f5.6 to begin to match the sharpness of my 135L at f2.0 (the test shots were of the portrait of Andrew Jackson on a $20 bill). Otherwise, on FF body this lens is wonderful. It disagrees completely with the definition that you give! I don't know about other photographers but I do not have many applications for this focal length. I actually have to walk 1/2 way up the stairs to be able get folk in the frame. You will never be able to beat this lense, believe me, i have tried them all. We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. i also have the 300mm f4.5 non ED nikkor which is quite nice . Or is there a use case for fitting the Samyang 135mm to a Panasonic gx85 (or Panasonic gh5) ?? However, all the reviews were made by nature and sports photographers, and I would like to find out more about their performance in astrophotography. However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. This thing is a beast in comparison. But you raise the exact point, that primes should be chosen with a 2x factor.

James Cole Obituary 2021, Willie Stargell Wife, Chantilly Sheet Cake Publix, Manteca Car Swap Meet 2022, Ironman World Championship Results 2021, Articles C